I don’t doubt that the ancients believed in a
firmament, a solid dome that covered a flat earth..
To the ancients, the stars were either attached to this firmament or were
holes in which the light of heaven could poke through. The Genesis flood was the result of the temporary but
determined removal of the firmament – a withdrawal of this solid fixture that separated the
primordial waters of chaos and made space for the brooding spirit of God to
create.
And on and on.
Again, the ancients clearly believed in a firmament. I don’t think that people who now say that
the ancients believed that there was a firmament above are slandering them. They aren’t making it up. They aren’t taking something literally that
was intended by the ancients to be taken as metaphor.
The firmament is referenced in the Bible and elsewhere. It is assumed. Ancient God-talk assumes it.
Here’s the thing.
There is no firmament.
It doesn’t exist.
But the Bible says it does. The ancients believed that. I'm not making that up.
There used to be a part of me that really thought that modern scholarship was being sort of
presumptive. Like, we really don’t know
what they believed. Our modern
scientific categories didn’t really exist then.
We’re separated by time and culture, and we can’t say for sure what was
happening in the brains of the ancients.
Perhaps it was all meant to be poetic.
But no, I don’t think that anymore. They believed in a firmament.
And there isn’t one.
If I had come across that fact 10 or even 5 years go, it
might have really shaken me. The term is new for me, but my default
religious upbringing was concordist. That is, the Bible could be read in such a way that it was
scientifically accurate. It had to be or else it would all crumble. Not in a
revisionist sense, but in a historical critical sense in which the original
writers (whoever they were) couldn’t have believed in a firmament. In that view, the Bible can’t really
reference a firmament. Not really.
But they did.
Clearly. And they were absolutely 100% wrong about that.
A few years ago this would been hugely problematic to me. This would have been something to either ignore or explain away. It could only destroy faith. But now, I find this refreshing and
liberating. It plays a positive role in the life of faith. God-talk can only take place
in the context of language. And language
is cultural. We must use the language that
we have, and our words can only be used in reference to reality as we perceive
it. But we don’t perceive rightly.
We don’t perceive rightly.
But we can still speak of God, and I don’t think God is mad
about that.
